Wednesday, December 28, 2011

HAVE A GREAT THURSDAY READERS!

Well, only 11+ days until the "Game of the Century - Part 2" is here. There is absolutely no doubt that this LSU football team is "lazer focused" and will be fully prepared to put Bama away a 2nd time. And, if they do, this team will surely go down in history as one of the BEST teams to ever play NCAA football. They have played the most difficult schedule any NCAA football team has ever played, beating 8 teams that were in the top 25 ranking when LSU played them. Of those 8, three were in the top 5 - Oregon #3, Alabama #2 and Arkansas #3.

I'm sure most readers have now heard the news that LSU landed a HUGE commitment in Indiana Quarterback Gunner Kiel on Tuesday. He is a 5 * rated QB and rated as the #1 Quarterback in the Country. Thanks to strong and persistent efforts by Coach Miles and QB Coach Kragthorpe, including a visit to watch him play in his school's 4A Championship game, the work paid off. This guy put up over 2,400 yards passing and 29 TD's plus over 400 yards rushing and another 11 TD's running in his Senior year alone! I watched a video clip of him in their last game and I thought "WOW"! This guy is the real deal.........he looked like former Florida QB Tim Tebow "on steriods"! He can throw a lazer pass 60+ yards with incredible accuracy, and he can run. He's a big boy.......6'4" and 225 lbs. He has completed his High School classwork and will enroll at LSU in January. That will make him eligible to participate in Spring Practice. Together with Zack Mettenburger and Steven Rivers (Redshirt Freshman next year), LSU will have a GREAT quarterback core for several years to come.

Now to ethanol issues...........the article below indicates the ethanol industry is preparing and accepting the loss of their "golden goose" ethanol tax subsidies which are set to expire on December 31st (next week). It will be interesting to see if refineries will resume blending at least some ethanol free gas since they won't have their $0.45/gallon tax credit to offset their costs to blend the "corn gas".



Ethanol industry will survive end of tax credit
By Janet Kubat Willette
jkubat@agrinews.com
Date Modified: 12/21/2011 3:59 PM

The ethanol industry is already feeling the impact of the elimination of the volumetric ethanol excise tax credit.

The price of ethanol has dropped $1.10 in the last two months, said Randall Doyal, chief executive officer of Al-Corn Clean Fuels in Claremont. Blenders are selling the ethanol in their tanks to take advantage of the credit before it expires on Dec. 31.

He figures the price will straighten out in time and that most ethanol plants will weather the storm. After all, they knew the end of the credit was coming so they had time to prepare.

But anytime the market is upside down like it is now, it's painful, Doyal said.

The volumetric ethanol excise tax credit, which is also known as the blender's credit, was created in 2004. The amount of the credit has been reduced from 51 cents per gallon to the current 45 cents per gallon of ethanol blended with gasoline. The credit goes to blenders and fuel marketers, not to ethanol plants.

Jeff Broin, chief executive officer of Poet, said in a conference call earlier this month that the elimination of the credit may have a slight impact on ethanol plant profitability.

It will also impact drivers, increasing prices at the pump an average of 4 cents per gallon. Ethanol lowers all prices at the pump 17 cents per gallon, saving every driver in America $100 per year, he said.

The ethanol tax credit was visionary, Broin said. It nurtured a fledgling industry to where 10 percent of the nation's fuel supply is ethanol.

Ethanol is a homegrown fuel that lowers emissions leading to cleaner air and creates jobs in the United States.

Poet operates several ethanol plants in Minnesota and Iowa.

Ethanol plants have continued to improve efficiency since they began popping up across the countryside, Broin said. They have cut energy use in half and water use by 80 percent. The industry is increasing yield of ethanol per bushel of corn by nearly 20 percent.

The ethanol industry has matured to a point where it can survive without the tax credit, Broin said.

Unlike the oil industry, which has had subsidies for a hundred years, ethanol is willing to move away from its tax credit after 30 to 35 years, he said. Broin said he thinks the oil industry should give up their tax incentives and compete with ethanol on a level playing field.

Likewise, he said the ethanol industry isn't concerned about competing with other countries except in cases where those countries have a tariff.

"My concern is parity," Broin said.

Export markets for ethanol have grown in importance in the past 18 months to two years, he said. With the country locked at 10 percent ethanol use, it is exporting less expensive ethanol and importing more expensive oil.

The ethanol industry is working hard to get E15 to keep more U.S. ethanol in the country and displace more foreign oil. The Environmental Protection Agency did move to approve E15 about a year and a half ago, but there are numerous hurdles to installing E15 pumps, Broin said. He's confident that once the regulatory hurdles are cleared, E15 will be competitive in the marketplace.

Now is a time to evaluate the role the government plays in renewable fuels going forward, Broin said.

Maintaining the Renewable Fuels Standard and continued investment in cellulosic ethanol are critical, he said. Cellulosic ethanol has the potential to produce 80 billions gallons of ethanol per year, but no one is producing it yet on a commercial scale. The cellulosic ethanol tax credit expires at the end of 2012 and it's important that this be extended, he said.

The biofuels loan guarantee program is vital to getting the fledgling industry off the ground, Broin said.

"Pete" Landry........comments welcome..........at way2gopete@yahoo.com

Saturday, December 24, 2011

MERRY CHRISTMAS ALL!

Merry Christmas to all my loyal website readers. From my family to yours, wishing you and your family a Healthy, Happy, Blessed and Joyful Christmas!

I will be announcing two new additions to PeteLandrysRealGas.com in early 2012. I really believe that you will be very excited to see the new additions.

"Pete" Landry

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

HAVE A GREAT WEDNESDAY READERS!

I presume readers have heard that LSU Football Coach Les Miles won the AP (Associated Press) "Coach of the Year" award today. Yet another great honor for a GREAT year for the LSU football program.

Here is an interesting article on the economics of making ethanol from sugarcane. Brazil makes all of their ethanol from sugarcane. But, according to this article, the high sugar prices do not make it favorable to make ethanol in the US from sugar cane compared to corn.



Sugarcane Ethanol Economics
By Mike Bryan | December 12, 2011

Ethanol production from sugarcane is clearly a viable option in various parts of the world. The consideration to produce ethanol from sugarcane is always just under the surface in any country that grows cane. It makes perfect sense. It’s plentiful, it’s relatively low cost compared to grain and is grown in many regions of the world and often on marginal land.

The deciding factor is not viability or technology, the issue is the world price of sugar. Between 2006 and 2011, the price of sugar, while having numerous peaks and valleys, has risen from about 18 cents per pound to as high as 29 cents per pound. Given the fact that global demand for sugar is on the increase and current weather conditions are not favorable in Brazil, Russia and some other parts of the world, it does not appear that the price of sugar will be coming down any time soon.

A debate has raged for years in the United States regarding the lifting of restrictions on the amount of sugar-based ethanol that can be imported, particularly from Brazil. On the surface, the argument can be made that ethanol is a global commodity and should be freely traded without restrictions. It could also be said that the establishment of trade barriers disadvantages developing countries economically.

But what it really comes down to is supply and demand. This is the primary problem with sugar-based ethanol. Because of high sugar prices, Brazil is now importing ethanol from the United States. This has nothing to do with its capacity to produce ethanol, but is related primarily to the world price of sugar and, more recently, drought conditions.

At a current price of nearly 23 cents per pound for raw sugar, it is simply not economically viable for Brazil or any other country to produce ethanol. The Australian sugarcane industry has looked at ethanol for years and to date only one small ethanol plant uses sugarcane as its feedstock.

So why would the United States, where it has been deemed strategically important to reduce our dependence of imported oil, move from that dependence to dependence on Brazilian ethanol, rather than continue to develop our own production? Energy security is not just relegated to oil, it’s about energy in all forms. Encouraging greater sugarcane-to-ethanol production by opening the door to expanded imports has environmental impacts, not the least of which could pose significant land use issues in developing countries.

The restrictions currently in place for imported ethanol have served America well and should be maintained. It has encouraged domestic production, while keeping sufficient amounts of imported product to help maintain a stable market.

That’s the way I see it!

Author: Mike Bryan
Chairman, BBI International
mbryan@bbiinternational.com

"Pete" Landry....comments welcome........at.....way2gopete@yahoo.com

Monday, December 19, 2011

HAVE A GREAT MONDAY READERS!

Only 21 days until the "Game of the Century - Part II" when our LSU Tigers will again face the Alabama Crimson Tide for the BCS National Championship on January 9, 2012 in the Mercedes Benz Superdome. A win for the Tigers would surely put this LSU team amongst the elite list of College teams to ever play the game. When they beat Bama for the second time, they will be 14-0, something no other LSU team has ever done. Up to now, LSU has beat 8 ranked opponents at the time they played them.......3 of which were in the top 5. By beating Bama again, they will have played 9 ranked opponents, of which 4 were in the top 5! That is an incredible resume, which very few College teams has ever done.

And, what about those Lafayette "Ragin' Cajuns" winning the R&L Carriers New Orleans Bowl Saturday night in the Superdome! A 50 yard field goal by the Cajuns with only 4 seconds left on the clock won the first bowl game for the Cajuns in 41 years! The quarterback for the Cajuns, Blaine Gautier from Paulina in St. James Parish, broke former Cajun quarterback Jake Delome's records for passing yards and touchdowns, a record that has stood for 15+ years! Congratulations to our ULL Lafayette Ragin' Cajuns!

Here's another interesting article on how the American public is starting to express their frustration with ethanol gasoline. With Federal subsidies for ethanol expiring on January 1, 2012, it'll be interesting to see if Louisiana refineries will resume blending at least some of their gasoline production as ethanol free gas next year.


Keelan: The anti-ethanol uprising
by Opinion | December 16, 2011

Editor’s note: This op-ed is by Don Keelan, a certified public accountant and resident of Arlington. The piece first appeared in the Bennington Banner.

If the Occupy Wall Street contingents believe they have a cause to create a revolution — move over. Their cause pales next to the one that the “Cylinder Index” crowd has.
And just so everyone knows who’s who, Occupy — or OWS — is a fairly recent phenomenon that had its origins, as its name describes, at New York City’s Wall Street. They claim to speak for the 99% of Americans who have been left behind and have no possible way, whatsoever, to share in the riches that the other 1% of Americans embrace. The allocation of the percentages can be questioned but for now it’s not important.

The “Cylinder Index” sector cannot quantify their legions but as you will shortly see, it is a large group of Americans. And I might add, the basis for their complaint emanates from frustration, costly outlays and time wasted — and it is because they can’t start their gasoline-driven small engines. The engines have been compromised by the inclusion of 10% ethanol in the gas mixture.
For the uninitiated, weekend do-it-yourselfers and recreational boaters and snowmobilers, measure their “life comfort level” by the number of things in their garages (or barns) that have gas-fired cylinders.

A Cylinder Index of 25 or greater represents a huge achievement not to mention a high degree of satisfaction with one’s station in life. And herein lies an example of that status:

Equipment and the number of cylinders
Pickup truck — 8
Snowblower — 2
Automobile — 6
Lawnmower — 1
Power boat — 2
Chain saw –1
Snowmobile — 2
Leaf blower — 1
4-wheeler (ATV) — 2
Weed trimmer — 1
Total: 26

So just imagine the frustration when one goes with pride into their garage and tallies up his or her “Cylinder Index’” If it comes close to the above, one has surely arrived at a heavenly state — they are at peace with themselves, their family and neighbors.
However, in recent years these folks are at peace with no one. They are raving mad. Their small engines will not start — they’ve been completely gummed up, clogged, because the gasoline they had placed in their small engines has been laced with 10 percent ethanol — a corn-based refined product.

When a mixture of gasoline, laced with ethanol sits for a while in a small engine the ethanol decomposes and turns into water and guck. And it is a known fact that most small engine owners do not use their equipment on a daily basis — therefore the decomposing process is well at work.

This raises the question — why do we use ethanol in the first place? According to some experts its use and production are costly and detrimental to the environment. And wouldn’t you know, the federal government provides farmers with billions of dollars in subsides to grow the corn.

It has been reported in the Washington Times, that over 24 percent of the corn crop must be diverted to the production of ethanol. This translates to 11 acres of corn for each car on the road. In the same Times article, it was noted that 21 acres of corn are needed to make a gallon of ethanol. When a car’s tank is filled up and its gas has been consumed, it will have produced 19 percent more carbon monoxide than regular gasoline.

The farm, energy and environmental lobbyists have done a terrific job in getting Congress to issue the ethanol mandates. Farmers must love them for it. The lobby groups have been so successful, the 10 percent mandate is scheduled to go up by 50 percent — to 15 percent ethanol content per gallon of gasoline. And one wonders why food costs are so high and meat from corn fed animals is priced out of reach?

The Cylinder Index folks are not happy — their engines won’t start and they know it will take weeks in the repair shops (assuming that they can get an appointment) and hundreds of dollars to get their small engines running again. And if this isn’t frustrating enough — they know that by using gasoline with ethanol they will get to repeat the process over again.

The Occupy Wall Street contingent has made its mark — but just wait until the Cylinder Index contingent finally conclude that they have had enough.

"Pete" Landry.........comments welcome......at way2gopete@yahoo.com

Wednesday, December 14, 2011

HAVE A GREAT THURSDAY READERS!


Here is yet another article citing continued pressure by food related industries to the continued increases in feed costs causing significant increases in poultry, beef, pork, etc. I'm sure this fight won't end soon.


Livestock, poultry groups request hearing to evaluate RFS

By Kris Bevill | December 07, 2011

A coalition of livestock and poultry lobby groups submitted a letter to the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee leaders on Dec. 7, requesting a hearing to evaluate the economic impact of the renewable fuel standard (RFS). A hearing is warranted based on increasing feed prices for livestock producers, according to the groups, which they believe is a direct result of increased ethanol production in response to RFS mandates.

“As representatives of the livestock and poultry industry, we remain concerned over the continued pressure on grain supplies and the impact this is having on the bottom line and risk management strategies of livestock and poultry producers,” the groups stated in the letter. The coalition, which includes the American Meat Institute, the National Pork Producers Council, the National Chicken Council and 13 other livestock and poultry groups, further expressed concern over reports that congressional support is growing for a modification to the RFS that would allow corn-based ethanol to qualify as an advanced biofuel. The coalition believes a modification of that sort would only exacerbate the already tight corn supply situation.

The coalition also cited the U.S. EPA’s recent discovery of fraudulent renewable identification numbers (RINs) as reason to examine the RFS, stating that the RIN system is likely only one of “potentially hundreds of areas that highlight the problems with the current rigid RFS compliance system.”

Matt Hartwig, communications director for the Renewable Fuels Association, said livestock groups are falsely blaming the ethanol industry for high corn prices and are ignoring the real factors at play in the commodity market. “The corporate livestock lobbies are seeking a return to the day when they could buy corn under the cost of production for American farmers,” he said. “In doing so, they are scapegoating ethanol as the cause of higher corn prices and giving a free pass to hedge funds, market speculators, oil dictators and a host of other factors that all play a greater role in raising corn and food prices than does ethanol.”

Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., serves as chairwoman of the Senate EPW committee. James Inhofe, R-Okla., is the ranking member of the committee. Both are outspoken opponents of corn-based ethanol. A representative for Boxer said the committee is currently reviewing the livestock coalition’s request for a hearing.

"Pete" Landry.........comments welcome...........at ...way2gopete@yahoo.com


Saturday, December 10, 2011

HELLO READERS - HAVE A GREAT WEEK!

Hello Readers..........well, LSU's "Honey Badger" didn't get the Heisman, but the publicity should propel him for a much better showing next year, provided he continues to perform to the level he did this year, and stay out of trouble.

I know many LSU fans were upset to learn that the Tigers must play Alabama in "The Game of the Century - Part II" for the BCS National Championship on January 9th of next year. The Tigers opened a 1 point favorite, primarily due to the game being played in the Superdome, which is essentially a home field for the Tigers.

I haven't posted on the Blog in awhile, but I thought you might be very interested in this article which I found today. This action by Congress may in fact delay if not kill the "E-15" or 15% ethanol gasoline issue for awhile, although I'm sure the ethanol lobby group will fight "tooth and nail" to try to get 15% ethanol gasoline to market. Here's the article:

PS: I urge all readers to check their owners manuals regarding fuel recommendations. Even though the EPA, in it's approval of 15% ethanol gas indicated it was safe for 2001 and newer passenger cars and light trucks, many 2001 and newer vehicle owners manuals disagree. I have a 2008 Mercury Sable and a 2009 Ford F-150. Both vehicle owners manual warns "do not use fuel with greater than 10% ethanol. Any engine damage caused by use of other than specified fuel may result in engine damage and may not be covered by vehicle warranty"!


Last Updated: December 10. 2011 1:00AM

Lawmakers: Block ethanol blend

Bipartisan group says use of E15 may cause damage to engines

David Shepardson/ Detroit News Washington Bureau

Washington —A bipartisan group of more than 70 House members is urging a congressional block on higher levels of ethanol blended into gasoline.

Automakers and other engine makers have clashed with corn growers since 2010 over whether the United States should allow the use of a new blend of ethanol called E15 because it is 15 percent biofuel. The Environmental Protection Agency has approved the use in all vehicles from 2001 and newer.


In August, the EPA approved fuel labels designed to warn drivers of older vehicles not to use the fuel, but it still must be registered before the fuel can go on sale. In February, the House voted 285-136 to block the EPA from moving ahead with E15 regulations.

Now, in a letter to the top Republican and Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee, members of Congress want the block on higher ethanol levels included in a spending measure to fund the government's operations through Sept. 30.


"E15 is not ready for prime time," said the letter signed by Reps. Gary Peters, D-Bloomfield Township; Mike Rogers, R-Brighton; John Conyers, D-Detroit; Tim Walberg, R-Tipton; Bill Huizenga, R-Zeeland; Darrell Issa, R-Calif.; and Loretta Sanchez, D-Calif., among others. The amendment to block the fuel is co-sponsored by Peters and Rep. John Sullivan, R-Okla. "More thorough research and testing are necessary to ensure that E15 will not harm consumer investments," the letter said. "The desire to allow for more ethanol to enter the transportation fuel pool should not trump sound science."


Automakers and other groups have opposed approval of E15, warning it could damage engines in some models. Automakers "unanimously expressed concerns that E15 is likely to harm engines, void warranties and reduce fuel efficiency," said the congressional letter. The letter noted that the National Renewable Energy Laboratory says E15 causes significant damage to marine engines. Automakers have twice filed suit challenging approval of use for the fuel.


Growth Energy, an ethanol trade group that first sought the approval for the fuel in early 2009, said previously it expected E15 to be at pumps by the end of 2011. That seems unlikely now.

The group says it is essential to move to the higher blend in order to use the higher amounts of ethanol required by Congress under a 2007 energy act.

It says more than 136,000 new green-collar jobs will be created nationwide by moving to E15.


Opponents of ethanol argue that the use of more than 40 percent nation's corn has boosted food prices for consumers and feed costs for farmers. For the first time this year, more corn was used to produce ethanol than to feed animals in the United States.

dshepardson@detnews.com

(202) 662-8735



From The Detroit News: http://detnews.com/article/20111210/POLITICS03/112100322/Lawmakers--Block-ethanol-blend#ixzz1gCVGzzti

"Pete" Landry...........comments welcome.............at.................. way2gopete@yahoo.com