Friday, September 30, 2011

HAPPY SATURDAY READERS!


Several great football games Saturday. Arkansas vs Texas A&M will be interesting to see how the Aggies (who will be joining the SEC next year) do against the Hogs. But, the one that will give LSU a good insight about two upcoming opponents will be the Alabama vs Florida game. It will be on national TV at 7:00 pm on ESPN.

Don't forget the LSU game against Kentucky kicks off at 11:20 am (before noon). I know the fans hate these game times as do I. There is absolutely nothing better than a Saturday night game in "Death Valley"!

I will not Blog on Sunday, my day off. Also, I will be out of town on Monday, returning on Tuesday afternoon. Giving my ethanol gas presentation to the Rotary Club in Bay Springs, Mississippi.

Here is a rather interesting article related to ethanol that I think you will find very interesting:


Analysis: Corn export dominance to bend, not break

By Karl Plume

CHICAGO | Fri Sep 30, 2011 12:14pm EDT

Reuters) - For the first time in 40 years, U.S. corn exporters are not out-selling the rest of the world.

Domestic ethanol is sucking up record crops. Emerging suppliers like Brazil and Ukraine are taking export share, while traditional exporters like Argentina move to open new markets. And consumers worldwide are looking to save every penny, cutting shipping costs or using other types of feed.

After supplying four out of every five kernels of corn traded internationally in the mid-1990s, U.S. market share was projected to shrink to 45 percent this season, with U.S. dominance particularly hard hit in the past 10 years.

However, that decade-long erosion should stabilize or at least slow as global demand growth may start to outpace steadily rising production outside of the United States, and as demand for corn from the U.S. ethanol industry plateaus.

Still, the stiff competition in a market the United States once dominated appeared to be here to stay.

"Other countries have been stepping up to the plate and improving their exporting abilities, getting phytosanitary agreements in place, and things of that sort," said Sterling Smith, analyst with Country Hedging.

For instance, Argentina, the world's No. 2 corn exporter, is currently working out a health protocol that would allow China, the world's second largest consumer of the grain, to import corn from the South American country.

Argentina, Ukraine and Brazil, the world's largest corn suppliers behind the United States, could see their combined market share grow to 41 percent in the marketing year ended September 2012 from 18 percent a decade ago, according to U.S. Agriculture Department data.

"As foreign production over the past 10 years has grown faster than foreign consumption, our export potential has eroded," said Rich Pottorff, chief economist with Doane Advisory Services.

"The outlook is a little brighter over the next decade than it was in the past decade, but that's not to imply that U.S. exports are going to rebound to the kind of market share we had a decade ago," he said.

PEAK ETHANOL

One big obstacle for U.S. corn exports has been the ethanol industry, seen soaking up 40 percent of the U.S. crop this year, up from less than 10 percent a decade ago. Proximity to crops in the Midwest farm belt often allows ethanol makers to outbid exporters.

That rapid demand growth was seen tempered by 2015 as the Renewable Fuels Standard tops out its requirement for corn-ethanol blending in the U.S. fuel supply at 15 billion gallons, up from 12.6 billion gallons this year.

With U.S. corn production steadily trending higher as science pushes the upper bounds of yield potential, a larger share of the U.S. crop would then be available to livestock feeders and exporters, analysts said.

"Assuming that they don't raise the renewable fuels standard mandate and 15 billion gallons of ethanol is about all we can use domestically, then we've clearly seen the big gains in demand from the ethanol industry already," Pottorff said.

CHINA'S DEMAND GROWING

The next great growth area for U.S. corn demand may now lie half a world away -- in China.

An increasingly affluent population in the world's most populous nation is urbanizing and upgrading diets at an exponential rate, requiring more grain to produce meat, eggs and dairy products. Demand from industrial processors was also soaring.

"With demand from the (U.S.) ethanol sector topping out, China's going to be the next big market factor," said Shawn McCambridge, grains analyst with Jefferies Bache.

"Their string of self-sufficiency in feed grains is slowly declining. If their economy continues to grow and demand for corn-based products such as meat continues to increase, they're going to have to come into the market more aggressively."

U.S. corn prices plunged more than 6 percent to a nine-month low on Friday after the USDA pegged quarterly corn stocks well above market expectations. This revived trade talk of potential large corn purchases by China, although no deals have been confirmed.

China's domestic corn consumption, projected by USDA at 182.5 million tonnes this year, is rising faster than production, seen at 178 million tonnes, according to USDA. Its state stockpile of the grain has been whittled down in recent years and is believed to be at less than a one-month supply.

China, formerly a large corn exporter, imported more than 1 million tonnes of U.S. corn in each of the previous two marketing years and was projected to import at least 2 million tonnes in the current 2011/12 season, according to USDA.

In a Reuters poll on Thursday, analysts on average forecast imports to hit 4 million tonnes. Other forecasts have suggested even larger imports of up to 9 million tonnes this year and 20 million tonnes by 2020.

ACREAGE THE KEY

Whether corn production outside the United States can keep pace with such a jump in world import demand will be the key to determining if U.S. market share continues to shrink, stabilizes, or if it bounces back.

Corn output outside the United States has grown far faster than global demand for imports over the past 10 years, thereby narrowing the world corn deficit that U.S. supplies have traditionally filled.

The deficit of 61 million tonnes in 2001 will shrink to a projected 39 million tonnes this year, according to USDA data.

If foreign corn acreage were to freeze at the current level while yields and demand continue to grow as they have over the past decade, the deficit would rebound to roughly 2.5 billion bushels, or about 63 million tonnes, Pottorff said.

But if acreage continues to grow by the roughly 6 million acres a year as is has averaged over the past decade, along with demand and yield growth trends, that deficit would narrow to 1.4 billion bushels, or about 35 million tonnes, he said.

The reality -- to be determined by market prices, the broader economic climate, global weather and other factors -- lies somewhere in the middle.

High corn prices will keep encouraging output growth, which must come from higher yields in the United States and China as the top growers have little room left to expand farmed acres.

China this week said it would look to boost domestic production, possibly planting higher-yielding genetically modified crops.

Brazil and Argentina were more likely candidates for opening up unused land to corn seeding.

"Pete" Landry..........comments welcome at......... way2gopete@yahoo.com

Thursday, September 29, 2011

HAPPY FRIDAY READERS!

Gave a presentation on ethanol gas issues to the Eunice (St Landry Parish) Rotary Club yesterday. Great folks and they gave me a very warm welcome. I get the same response every time I give this presentation: "I didn't know that! Thank you so much for informing us."

For readers from Iberia Parish........Gene sent me an e-mail reporting that the Leleux Grocery at 5106 LA Hwy 14 in New Iberia has converted to a Chevron Station and, of course, has ethanol gas.

The following is a very interesting article about the State of Florida's frustration with ethanol gas and plans at least one Congressman has to address it:


REP. MATT GAETZ: Let's junk Florida's inefficient ethanol mandate

September 28, 2011 9:24 AM

Some members of the Florida Legislature gauge their success or failure by the number of laws they are able to enact. I think a little differently. When my time in the Legislature ends, I’ll always be proudest of the outdated, burdensome and sometimes downright silly laws and regulations I fought to repeal.

One prime example is the Florida requirement that gasoline sold in our state contain between 9 percent and 10 percent ethanol. I hope to scrap this requirement during the upcoming legislative session.

The Florida ethanol mandate became law in 2008. The argument was that ethanol use could reduce carbon emissions and create “green jobs” in our state, given the prolific sugar growing in South Florida. We now know the benefits of ethanol were overstated and the negative consequences were overlooked.

Today, government is literally crawling into our gas cans with a product that can be harmful to our engines, our economy and our environment.

And with soaring gas prices impacting our pocketbooks, government should not mandate a product that cuts miles per gallon. Modest estimates show that Florida’s ethanol mandate is costing drivers a minimum of $75 per year — putting the most significant financial burden on drivers living paycheck to paycheck. That’s unacceptable.

Auto manufacturers are so concerned about the corrosive impacts of ethanol on engines that they are warning consumers. Hyundai, for example, tells buyers that “the use of ethanol may result in negative effects to cold starting, as well as engine driveability. … It will also result in reduced fuel economy.” Of specific interest to Floridians, the harm is even more pronounced with boat and lawn mower engines.

But more than engines are harmed by our ethanol policy. The effect of ethanol mandates on global food prices (and the impact on hungry people around the world) raises serious moral concerns with using corn as energy.

There are 3 billion malnourished people on Earth, more than ever before in human history. Corn and grains make up more than 80 percent of food intake worldwide. The United States has played a major role in feeding the world, with our corn exports tripling over the past decade. If more corn is inefficiently converted to ethanol — and not exported — our trade deficit will worsen and poor people who depend on our food exports will die.

Would harm to our engines, our economy and the most vulnerable people in the world be worthwhile if we could reduce dependence on foreign oil and help our environment? Maybe to some. The problem is that ethanol is an energy loser with serious environmental dangers.

A Cornell University research study concludes that ethanol generates a 29 percent energy loss, meaning it takes more than a gallon of gasoline to produce a gallon of ethanol. Even the Obama administration’s Environmental Protection Agency issued a 2009 report showing that ethanol mandates will increase carbon emissions in the short term and may need to be in effect for 100 years before significant reductions are realized.

Ethanol production is also highly water-intensive. It takes 1,700 gallons of water to produce one gallon of ethanol. In a state where water resources are scarce, diverting and polluting large amounts water is hardly an investment in a clean future.

Contrary to the promises, no substantial “green industry” has emerged from the ethanol mandate. By 2009, 9 percent of all ethanol plants had gone bankrupt. With sugar prices climbing, the vast majority of ethanol used in Florida is corn-based and shipped from other states. Higher costs, borne by Floridians, are needlessly subsidizing corporate welfare for a distant corn industry.

As a nation, we must never end the search for efficient energy alternatives. Ethanol, however, is an affront to the efficiency we covet. Hopefully, federal lawmakers will realize this reality if states such as Florida show leadership.

The best way to unlock America’s energy potential is to reduce the red tape that government winds around innovators and cutting-edge research. When we unleash investment in new technology, more creative outcomes can be generated in the private sector by the forces of a free market.

Energy independence is the challenge of a generation — but we won’t meet that challenge with costly feel-good laws that hurt people. Repealing Florida’s ethanol mandate is a good place to start.

--

Matt Gaetz represents portions of Okaloosa and Santa Rosa counties in the Florida House of Representatives. He lives in Fort Walton Beach.

"Pete" Landry.....................comments welcome at way2gopete@yahoo.com

Tuesday, September 27, 2011

HAPPY WEDNESDAY READERS!


I will not post on Thursday as I will be giving a presentation on ethanol gas issues to the Eunice, Louisiana Rotary Club midday on Wednesday, and returning home Thursday afternoon. Will post a blog for Friday.

No new ethanol news........thanks goodness, no new stations to report in the past week that has converted to ethanol gas.

Here is another article that shows how the response has been to the new 15% ethanol gas. This one is from the small engine manufacturers lobby:

OPEI Files Legal Challenge to E15 Misfueling Rule; EPA's Weak Ethanol Label Inadequate to Avoid Misfueling, Damage to Products

P OPEI Files Legal Challenge to E15 Misfueling Rule; EPA's Weak Ethanol Label Inadequate to Avoid misfueling, Damage to Products 09/21/2011

OPEI Files Legal Challenge to E15 Misfueling Rule;

EPA’s Weak Ethanol Label Inadequate to Avoid Misfueling, Damage to Products

Alexandria, Va. September 21, 2011 – The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (OPEI), along with automakers and marine manufacturers, today announced a formal legal challenge to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) “Regulation to Mitigate Misfueling” rule which was meant to address concerns about 15 percent ethanol blends and non-road products and older model-year vehicles.

OPEI and partner groups maintain that EPA’s weak labeling effort is completely inadequate to protect consumers and avoid potential misfueling and damage to millions of legacy products not designed to run on any ethanol fuel higher than E10.

“We are asking that the EPA do more to protect the consumer. We need to educate the public on a new fuel entering the market that is about to fundamentally change how we purchase and dispense gasoline. And, we need to ensure that consumers can still find E10 for the millions of product - lawnmowers, chainsaws, motorcycles, snowmobiles, ATVs and UTVs, boats and older cars – that still use an E10 legacy fuel,” said Kris Kiser, President and CEO of the Outdoor Power Equipment Institute.

OPEI points out that the EPA’s prior experience with fuel transitions and misfueling demonstrates that labeling alone is insufficient to prevent misfueling. As the EPA led the transition to unleaded fuels, the Agency reported a misfueling rate of nearly 15 percent almost ten years after the introduction of unleaded gasoline - even with a physical barrier at the pump.

“EPA even denied our petition to mandate the continued availability of E10, so consumers will still be able to purchase E10 at their local gasoline stations. Consumers are really on their own at this point, and we just think that is unfair and potentially harmful from both a safety and economic perspective,” said Kiser.

(OPEI says that a simple E15 label is completely inadequate to avoid misfueling and does not protect consumers and business owners from potential equipment damage and safety risks. OPEI says the EPA should do more.)

Background

Growth Energy, an ethanol industry trade group, petitioned the EPA in March 2009 to raise the limit on ethanol in gasoline from 10 to 15 percent. Several engine product and auto manufacturers as well as others urged EPA to be deliberative in its review process, assuring thorough and adequate testing to ensure that E15 would not harm existing products or pose safety risks. By approving E15 use in a small subset of engines on the road, there is a high risk that consumers will unknowingly or mistakenly put E15 in products for which it has not been approved.

In March 2011, auto, marine, motorcycle, outdoor power equipment, personal watercraft and snowmobile groups filed a petition for rulemaking today asking the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ensure the continued sale and availability of gasoline blends of no greater than 10 percent ethanol (E10) for the 400 million engine products used by tens of millions of people every day in the U.S.

About OPEI

The Outdoor Power Equipment Institute (OPEI) is an international trade association representing more than 80 engine and equipment manufacturers worldwide in the utility, forestry, landscape, and lawn and garden industry. OPEI is a recognized Standards Development Organization for the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) and active internationally through the International Standards Organization (ISO) in the development of safety standards. For more information, visit www.OPEI.org.

"Pete" Landry.............comments welcome at way2gopete@yahoo.com

Monday, September 26, 2011

HAPPY TUESDAY READERS!


This article appeared just a few days ago.......it indicates that livestock states are getting more and more frustrated that feed prices are continuing to go sky high due to corn being diverted to ethanol manufacturing, driving up the feed costs.

U.S. House bill would lower mandate to use ethanol

Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:25pm GMT

WASHINGTON, Sept 22 (Reuters) - Legislation was being drafted in the U.S. House of Representatives that would reduce the federal mandate to use fuel ethanol when corn supplies are tight, a congressional staff worker confirmed on Thursday.

The staffer said a bill was under consideration but declined to discuss details.

The Renewable Fuels Standard guarantees a share of the motor fuel market for corn-based ethanol. Livestock and dairy producers say the mandate gives a financial advantage to ethanol makers and unfairly boosts the cost of livestock feed.

According to consulting firm MF Global, the legislation would reduce the ethanol mandate by 25 percent when the corn stocks-to-use ratio is projected to be less than 7 percent and reduce it by 50 percent when the ratio would be 5 percent or less, a bare-bones level for supplies.

Representatives Bob Goodlatte, a Virginia Republican, and Bob Costa, a California Democrat, were the likely sponsors. They are from districts with large livestock industries.

The ethanol mandate for this year is 12.6 billion gallons. Production expected to exceed 13.5 billion gallons, due to exports and high oil prices, which make ethanol attractive.

A dozen bills involving ethanol have been filed in the House. Some would encourage ethanol use while others would limit the portion of ethanol in fuel or repeal a tax credit for the fuel. One bill would repeal the ethanol mandate. (Reporting by Charles Abbott; Editing by David Gregorio)


"Pete" Landry.................comments welcome at way2gopete@yahoo.com


Sunday, September 25, 2011

HAVE A GREAT MONDAY READERS!

No ethanol issues today............just FOOTBALL!

What a weekend for college and pro football! The LSU victory against West Virginia was not pretty, at least for the LSU defense, which gave up more passing yards than they have in a long, long time; BUT, the offense and special teams did what it needed to do to win. And, what a great win for the Saints today against a very good Houston team.

The AP poll has now moved LSU to #1, leap frogging Alabama and Oklahoma! The USA Today and Coaches poll comes in tomorrow. Here is the AP's top 10:

AP Top 25


I thought the following article today from the Wall Street Journal was both honest and also humorous.........the rest of College Football has it appears FINALLY conceded that the SEC is the BEST Conference in the nation:

[cfoot0925]Associated Press

LSU's Morris Claiborne returns a punt for a touchdown against West Virginia. After all, LSU plays in the SEC and West Virginia doesn't.

The rest of college football formally surrendered to the Southeastern Conference Sunday, ending a decades-long war that had become hopelessly one-sided.

The surrender took place just outside Appomattox, Va. SEC officials declined to explain why this site was chosen.

"What began 85 years ago in Pasadena has been finished today," the SEC said in a statement, referring to Alabama's 1926 Rose Bowl victory over Washington, which established Southern schools as a threat. "This is our sport now."

The commissioners of major-college football's other 10 conferences made the decision to capitulate in an emergency conference call Saturday night, following LSU's 47-21 demolition of West Virginia. The rout was the latest in a series of unfortunate encounters between SEC schools and supposedly quality opponents, including LSU-Oregon Sept. 3, Alabama-Michigan State in January and the last five national-title games, only one of which was in doubt at the end.

The terms of the surrender were released by the SEC. They include a number of reforms that seek to restore some dignity to the rest of college football, while giving the SEC its proper due:

The national championship: The Bowl Championship Series title game will continue to be held, but just as a matter of ceremony and to stimulate the economy. The real national-championship game will be designated each year by the SEC. This year it's LSU at Alabama, Nov. 5.

National-championship rematches: The SEC also reserves the right to campaign for an LSU-Alabama rematch in the BCS "title" game if the initial meeting is close and there are no other undefeated major-conference schools at season's end. The rest of college football will not bring up 2006, when SEC partisans pilloried the idea of an Ohio State-Michigan title-game rematch.

The No. 1 ranking: The rest of college football will concede that Oklahoma is not the nation's best team, even though the Sooners were the preseason No. 1, are 3-0 and have won the hardest true road game thus far (at then-No. 5 Florida State). LSU is now No. 1 in the Associated Press rankings, having done even more (beating Oregon in Dallas and West Virginia on the road).

Roster management: SEC programs will conduct seminars on how to use oversigning to build a better roster.

The chant: The SEC will ask its fans to wait until game's end to start chanting "S-E-C!", after the TV cameras have been turned off and the defeated team's fans have filed out of the stadium. This provision was issue No. 1 on the non-Southern schools' agenda. "Our alumni all across the country say the same thing," said an official representing the other major conferences. "Make it stop."

Realignment: West Virginia will remain in the Big East now that it knows what it would be getting into in the SEC. Texas A&M is still welcome to join, and Missouri may be considered as well, although both schools have been reminded that they would be forfeiting the right to ever win another conference championship in football, considering they can't even win an inferior Big 12. (A&M's chances of winning its first Big 12 title since 1998 took a serious hit in the Aggies' 30-29 come-from-ahead loss Saturday to Oklahoma State.)

Revenue sharing: The SEC will seize some TV revenue from the Pac-12, which has somehow wound up getting an average of $250 million annually from ESPN and Fox, while the average annual value of the SEC's deals with ESPN and CBS is about $205 million—even though the SEC has won an unprecedented five straight national titles.

Academics: Supporters of Pac-12, Big Ten and Atlantic Coast Conference schools will stop playing the academics card—that is, that their schools rank higher in research expenditures and reputation than the SEC's do.

Arkansas-Ohio State: Although Ohio State's 2011 Sugar Bowl victory over Arkansas has been vacated because of the Buckeyes' rules violations, and even though Arkansas is no Florida or LSU (i.e., the sort of A-list peer Ohio State should aspire to beat), the SEC will permit Buckeye fans to fondly remember that game. (Although OSU's official bowl record against the SEC remains 0-9.)

The SEC's programs hailed the surrender as a long-overdue acknowledgment of their obvious superiority. The non-Southern teams expressed relief that the nonconference portion of the season is basically over, and that the sides won't meet again for the most part until December and January.

The surrender was quickly ratified by 107 of the 108 non-SEC schools, with Boise State abstaining.

Write to Darren Everson at Darren.Everson@wsj.com


"Pete" Landry..............comments welcome: way2gopete@yahoo.com



Saturday, September 24, 2011

HAPPY SATURDAY & A GREAT WEEKEND READERS!


Big football weekend. Alabama will face their first real test when they take on Arkansas at 2:30 pm today. This will be a very interesting game to see as it relates to what LSU will be seeing towards the end of the season.

Meanwhile, LSU takes on West Virginia on ESPN on ABC at 7:00 pm. This will be the third top 25 opponent LSU plays this season. LSU is favored by 6 points. If our Tigers beat West Virginia in a convincing fashion, it could move them to the #1 ranking on Monday.

GEAUX TIGERS….. GEAUX TIGERS…..GEAUX TIGERS

I think you will find the following article rather interesting. It's a recent study that studies the cost of food products substantial increase in prices in recent years to ethanol production.


Let Them Eat Ethanol and Cash

BY GREG LINDSAY Today (9/22/11)

How biofuels and speculation are driving food prices to scary new heights

Why have global food prices spiked not once, but twice in the last three years, raising the specter of famine and triggering worldwide food riots--including the Arab Spring? Many explanations have been floated, including climate change-related droughts in Australia, volatile oil prices, “food security” export restrictions, and last but not least, feeding China’s strategic pork reserve.

But according to a scientific paper released this morning by the New England Complex Systems Institute, there are only two factors that matter: ethanol and financial speculation.

The former is easier to prove. A drop in the bucket only a decade ago, ethanol will consume a remarkable 40 percent of the U.S. corn crop this year, comprising 16% of world corn production and 4% percent of total grain production overall. The paper’s authors mapped the rise of ethanol production to the steady climb of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization’s Food Price Index since 2004 and found a close fit, much closer than Australia’s droughts (too small), oil price spikes (too late), or China’s craving for pork bellies (big, but not big enough). “Ethanol is much bigger. It’s bigger by a factory of 20,” says Yaneer Bar-Yam, one of the paper’s authors and the president of NECSI.



The paper’s second claim is more controversial. While ethanol is responsible for the long-term increase in baseline prices, it can’t explain the bubble-and-bust dynamics of 2007/2008 and 2010/2011. So NECSI’s researchers set out to build an all-purpose mathematical model of speculative bubbles, feeding it price data to see if there was another close fit.

What they found refutes the OECD’s findings and confirms the suspicions of Harpers’Frederick Kaufman --the repeal of the Commodity Exchange Act of 1936 and the deregulation of commodity futures in 2000 transformed the futures markets from an instrument of liquidity to a place to park one’s money. Instead of being a place where farmers and agricultural businesses set reasonable prices, the markets have become just another place for speculation.

“That regulation had limited the ability of investors to invest beyond a certain amount,” says Bar-Yam. “Its repeal enabled the index funds, which in turn opened the door to people who were not in the agricultural investment business to go into the commodities markets of corn, wheat, and so on.”

All of that money--commodity index holdings soared from $13 billion in 2003 to $317 billion in 2008--inevitably caused distortions in the market. “If you look at our figures, you’ll see there’s a huge difference between the futures price or the spot price and what should be the equilibrium one,” Bar-Yam says.

The authors’ recommendations are straightforward and immediate--to drive down prices for the world’s poor, governments must restore financial regulations (including the Commodity Exchange Act) and begin winding down ethanol production. “There is a moral imperative here,” says Bar-Yam. “And from an economic standpoint, efficient allocation and optimality are desirable things,” neither of which are currently being served. And if they don’t, as the authors noted last month in a related paper, the turmoil of Arab Spring may go global.


Read more columns like this in our continuing series, The Butterfly Effect

I don't post on Sundays........so, be back on Monday. Have a GREAT weekend!

"Pete" Landry.................comments welcome at way2gopete@yahoo.com