Sunday, August 5, 2012

HAVE A GREAT MONDAY READERS!

Do hope everyone has had a great weekend!  Was GREAT to see the Saints back in action in a pretty good game in Canton tonight.

Here's yet another article on the issue of the ethanol mandate........

"Pete"
=============================================


Our View: It's time for ethanol mandate to go
Corn prices affect most sectors of our national and local economy
Aug. 5, 2012  |  
The recent upward motion in gas prices is not entirely the fault of the petroleum industry. It's partly because of the drought that's plaguing much of our country this summer. That's right, it's related to agriculture -- specifically, the nation's corn crop.
That's because since 2005, the federal government has mandated that 40 percent of the American corn crop must go to ethanol production, for use in the fuel that is pumped into our motor vehicles. Gasoline prices rose 17 cents per gallon in July, the largest increase for July in more than a decade. Ethanol itself rose 17 percent in July, gaining 37.9 cents. Most ethanol is made from corn.
Corn is a commodity in the United States with intrinsic value because it is found in so many places. It's used as food, animal and pet feed, in ethanol (by federal mandate) and, well, it's used in some form in just about anything you can think of --toothpaste, crayons, paint, medications, candies, yogurt, plastics, paper, oil drills, preservatives, detergents and even blue jeans. It's transformed into cornmeal, corn oil, cornstarch and sweeteners that include corn syrup and high-fructose corn syrup. It's fermented for use in whiskey. Even the waste products -- cobs and germ, primarily -- have uses. Cobs are used in livestock feed, as absorbants for oil and other hazardous waste, in insecticides, fertilizers and as grit for tumbling and blasting. Corn germ is used to make stronger industrial glues.
Since 1990, the United States has increased its use of corn-based ethanol by more than 1400 percent, from 349 million bushes in 1990 to 4,900 bushels 2010, according to the Corn Refiners Association.
Under normal circumstances, this is all good news for the U.S. economy. America's corn production eclipses that of any other country in the world; it's more than double that of China, which is the next highest corn-producing nation.
But in 2012, we are experiencing normal circumstances. A severe drought is hitting the nation's corn crop hard, driving price skyward. And that either has or will affect the prices of all those products.
It's contributing to an untimely rise in gas prices, as noted above. It also threatens the poultry industry here on Delmarva, because up to 70 percent of a chicken's diet is corn. And unlike the corner gas station that can raise and lower pump prices as the price of a barrel of oil fluctuates, poultry is sold under contract, making it difficult to account for rising corn prices and remain profitable.
What we have right now is the equivalent of a perfect storm surrounding the price of corn.
The federal government mandates 40 percent of the nation's crop go to ethanol production. But some estimates have 40 percent of the 2012 corn crop already in jeopardy. If that estimate is roughly accurate and ethanol production from corn was halted immediately, the supply of corn for all the other uses listed above would be about the same as in more normal years.
What would this do the nation's automotive fuel supply? There's no definitive answer, but anecdotally, some claim the ethanol blend (10-15 percent of the fuel we pump) reduces gas mileage in most vehicles, even those that are supposed to operate efficiently using the blend. Smaller engines (lawn mowers, recreational boats and more) cannot handle the blend and must use pure gas. If using pure gas increases vehicle mileage by, say, 10-15 percent, we'd be using the same amount of fuel, but without the ethanol additive. So possibly zero effect.
If poultry takes another economic hit because of the corn shortage, it will have a ripple effect across Delmarva that will include lost jobs, higher unemployment and poverty rates, greater personal financial need and more closed businesses.
Poultry companies are asking, therefore, that the federal government grant a temporary exemption from the 40 percent mandate, along with a longer-term solution that would tie the amount of corn earmarked for ethanol production to each year's crop. If the net effect of the exemption is cost-neutral on motor vehicle fuels, a smarter long-term solution might be to scrap the mandate altogether.
The world's food supply --not a government biofuel mandate --should be the top priority. And with an expanding demand worldwide for corn exports, U.S. farmers should be fine with an increasing market demand for their product instead of a government mandate.